The Rwandan Genocide did not just happen by accident or even with only one incident; it was an explosion caused by multiple actions and built up hate. The Tutsis were the victims in this unfortunate occurrence and they have an interesting history surrounding them. The major physical fighting between the Tutsis and the Hutus started after Rwanda’s independence in 1962. These were not the first clashes, however, but they were the larger ones that were closer to the genocide. There was also an fascinating aftermath of the genocide that included a trial of those involved in the mass murder. The Rwandan Genocide was an ethnic conflict between the Hutus and the Tutsis and the conflict had interesting history surrounding it and an intriguing aftermath.
The Hutus and the Tutsis were once tribes in Africa. In 1894 the Germans colonized the area and put the two ethnically different groups together in a situations where they would have to work together. The Belgians gained Rwanda as a territory as one of Germany’s World War Two reparations. In this country there was a caste system; the Tutsis were the rich landowners and the Hutus were the poor farmers. If a Hutu were to come across some land he would be considered a Tutsi and if a Tutsi were to become poor he would be considered a Hutu. This is possible because these to ethnic groups were almost identical. They spoke the same language, practiced the same religion, ate similar foods, and shared the same culture. It would be almost impossible to tell if a Rwandan was a Hutu or a Tutsi. There is one thing that does distinguish them, however; their appearance. The Tutsis are generally tall, thin, and European in stature. The Hutus, on the other hand, are shorter and stockier in their appearance.
Because of these differences in appearance the Belgians and the Germans thought that the Tutsis were superior because they looked more European than the Hutus do. The Belgians let the Tutsis hold beneficial positions in the government and later in the Belgian reign they gave all Rwandans identity cards. These cards stopped the flexible caste system so any poor people at the time that the cards were issued were officially Hutus and could not eventually move up to be a Tutsi. Same for the Tutsis at the time, they could never fall out of there privileged, at the time, position. Once independence was in sight, however, the Belgians started to give the Hutus more rights and gave the people education. The Tutsis, the more educated of the pair, were leading the rebellion against the Belgians so the accordingly the Belgians switched sides and supported and educated the Hutus. In the end in nineteen sixty two Rwanda won its independence and many Tutsis had fled the country because of attacks from the Hutus. The remaining Tutsis had their rights and privileges taken away under the leader Juvénal Habyarimana’s regime installed in nineteen seventy three.
In response to being kicked out of their home land the Tutsis in Uganda formed a guerilla group called the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF). Their main goal was to invade Rwanda and overthrown the Habyarimana regime. In the August of nineteen ninety three the Habyarimana government agreed to let the RPF share some power in the government. There were many Hutu extremists who did not like this though.
The breaking point was April sixth nineteen ninety four when President Habyarimana’s plane was shot down by a mystery person. Nobody knows if it was a Hutu or Tutsi. Either side makes logical sense because the Tutsis did not like him because he was a Hutu but the Hutus did not like him because he was not exterminating the Tutsis. Once the president was killed all hell broke loose. The Interahamwe (Hutu extremist killers, means “those who attack together”) blockaded the exits, separated the Hutus from the Tutsis, and started hacking at the Tutsis. The Interahamwe were ruthless and did not even check to see if the Rwandan was really a Tutsi all the time, they just killed all of the taller people. The moderate Tutsis were also targeted because they did not mind the presence of the Tutsis in Rwanda. After the Tutsis and moderate Hutus were out of the way Agathe Uwilingiyimana, the moderate Hutu Prime Minister, was next on the list. The remaining United Nations soldiers anticipated this move and sent some troops to protect the Prime Minister and her children. They hid her in her compound and placed their forces around the compound but their small numbers could not withstand the blows from the Interahamwe. The Hutus got in and murdered the Prime Minister. Her children, however, survived. In only two weeks, a quarter of a million moderate Hutus and Tutsis were killed. The genocide would not end for another two months. In response to the Interahamwe, the RPF stood up and started pushing towards Kigali, the counties capitol. The stopped genocide wherever they were and provided a source of hope for the Tutsis of Rwanda. Because of the RPF’s fearless fighting Kigali fell to them on July fourth nineteen ninety four, approximately three months after the genocide started.
Experts say that eight hundred thousand people died, but the killing was not systematic so that is only a best guess. The number of the murdered is continually rising as more dead bodies are found. Approximately seven hundred fifty thousand Tutsis were killed, only one hundred thirty thousand survived. Approximately fifty thousand moderate Hutus were killed in the fighting as well. In the two thousand and two census it was found out that over one million Rwandans had died and about ninety four percent of them were Tutsi.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was set up by the United nations to try the leaders and major supporters to the genocide. It was located in Arusha Tanzania nineteen ninety eight. The first convicted criminal was Jean-Paul Akayesu, the mayor of Taba. Then it was Jean Kambanda, former Prime Minister. Thirty two other major Hutus were going to trial. The New York Times, however, declared that the tribunal was a fail because it took five years to do the limited amount that they did. In Rwanda the trials had been much more effective. By two thousand there had been two thousand five hundred trials and admitted three hundred death sentences.
The aftermath of the genocide was very horrible. There was terrible economy and education was down so there were not as many educated personnel as would be ideal for the society. There was lack of public things like; roads, bridges, and telephone lines. The because of the bad economy the Tutsis blamed their problems on the Hutus and tried to oppress them and the Hutus did the same to the Tutsis.
The Rwandan Genocide was not a freak event, it had a lot that lead up to and followed it. There was a huge history of disagreements and discrimination between the two groups long before the actual genocide happened. This includes the aspects of appearance and social stature. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was not very successful but the trials actually in Rwanda were very effective. The history leading up to the Genocide in Rwanda and the genocide’s aftermath were both intriguing and yet very simple.
http://www.unitedhumanrights.org/genocide/genocide_in_rwanda.htm
Hey Dianna, first off really good job with your blog. I really like the background and how you customized your blog by adding in pictures, polls, sentences to intrigue people and to make them want to read more, etc… I also like the fact that you did things similar to what I did them for example I did the same topic, Rwanda and I used a couple of the same pictures as you, but I did not talk about the history before the genocide as much as you did. You included information I did not even know about and I thought that was pretty cool for example, I did not know if a Tutsi became poor they were considered a Hutu and if a Hutu came across some land they would be considered a Tutsi. I also didn’t know that when the Tutsis were kicked out of power it had partly to do with the fact that the Belgians gave more power to the Hutus. By the way I noticed one or two times you had grammar mistakes, so just be a little bit more cautious next time. There are multiple other great things you did Dianna, but overall great job.
ReplyDeleteFrom,
Brandon
I really liked your blog! It has a lot of good, detailed information that would Rwanda. I especially like the picture you used for your background. I wanted to change mine but i never figured it out so it is cool that you were able to do so. Everything goes together really well. I also thought that the smaller post you did on the graph because it was a unique way to show the deaths. You did a great job!
ReplyDeleteI really love your blog. I thought it was great how you used the background picture and the poll to grab the reader’s attention. I also loved how you used pictures in the middle of your main post. It gave the readers a break from just words and it helped explain what was going on. So instead of just reading about it you were able to see what was going on too. Your additional posts were also great. I really liked the emotion in your words. When I read them I felt like I understood your feelings on the subject and you did that without using speaking in first person. So in the end your blog grabbed the reader’s attention and kept it not only with the pictures but also with your words. Great job.
ReplyDeleteYour blog did a really great job one telling the facts. I really understood what was going on. I liked how you explained how there were events leading up to the genocide. You also explained the aftermath, which led me to believe that although the genocide is over the conflict between the two are still not. Also as I said before I got to read about your opinion on the subject, which was really great. You also backed up your opinion with facts. I liked how you balanced out your opinion with the facts. You also didn’t let your opinion get in the way of telling the story.
ReplyDelete